Ocean of red ink logo

Obama drowns us in an ocean of red ink

Top Democrats flashing the white power sign

The first “black” president; the first real, half-black president; the second “black” mayor of NYC; and the woman who drawls black when campaigning for president in black churches.

2018 - Democrats flashing the White Power sign

2016 - Trump - Perot

Who is Allah?

Who is Allah?


Some say that Allah is the same god as the God of Judaism and Christianity – God, Jehovah, Yahweh, I am, Elohim, Adonai, The Lord God Almighty. Yet, Islam does not have the Ten Commandments, the foundational ethical code of Judaism and Christianity. Nor the Torah of Judaism. (Which is, of course, the first five books of the Christian Bible.) Nor the Old Testament. Nor the New Testament of Christianity.

Nor does Islam have any of the Bible’s history, laws, songs, or traditions. No teachings, proverbs, parables, or letters. The Bible was clearly not used as a resource for the Quran. It is therefore not the Jewish Bible or an extension of it, as is the Christian Bible.

Rather, it was written entirely on its own. By itself. Dictated by Allah to an illiterate man.

In fact, the Quran has only a few short passages mentioning a handful of the major figures from the Bible. Snippets of verbal tales he had heard, written in a cursory manner, and fundamentally opposite to how those people are revealed in the Bible.

Also, the Quran states explicitly that, “There is no god but Allah.” This is a cornerstone of Islam (a.k.a., “Submission”, “Surrender”, or “Subjugation”.) The “First Pillar”. And is inscribed above the entrance to mosques. Yet “Allah” never appears in the Bible. Not once. And “God” never appears in the Quran. Yet, Allah was already the name of the moon god of Arabia long before Muhammad was born. Allah, the Arabian moon god, was worshipped at the Kaaba, the same black rock in Mecca that today is  considered sacred by Muslims. (Muhammad’s father was named Abd Allah, or “servant of the moon god Allah.”) So Allah has history prior to Islam, and the God of Judaism and Christianity was well-recognized throughout the known world millennia before Muhammad – especially in Arabia where several Jewish tribes lived alongside Muhammad’s Arab tribe that already worshipped the moon god, Allah. Therefore, “Allah” is not “God” according to the Quran. And God is not Allah according to the Bible. Neither name appears in the other’s sacred book, nor are their teachings the least bit compatible. Plus, over the centuries of Muslim military conquest, the kafir (non-Muslims) who were subjugated (“Islam”) to Allah were never forced to swear submission to the God of Judaism and Christianity (“God”), but always to Allah, the god of Islam.

So who is he? Who is Allah? Think about this, God created Judaism 4,000 years ago, choosing the Jews as his special people. And Christ created Christianity 2,000 years ago, instructing his Jewish disciples to go out into the world to share the Good News with everyone. So both religions, built upon the ethical foundation of the Ten Commandments and the Jewish Bible, share the same foundational texts and worship the same God. Then, who, in a pique of jealousy toward these two great religions, created Islam in 632AD and ordered the warlord, Muhammad, to conquer the world for him? Who is Allah?

Please click the graphic above. The elements of which will reconfigure, to reveal the true identity of Allah.

No one died in Watergate


Obama calls America’s sweetheart

Obama calls America's sweetheart

The 2012 Presidential Election for Dummies

Stop the Charade

Stop the Charade

The liberal establishment has more power in choosing the Republican presidential candidate than the conservative base or the Tea Party movement

  • The liberal, establishment media choose which Republican presidential primary candidates will be slandered – claiming awards and adulation for each scalp collected – and which will be promoted by way of their primary endorsements (of course, never intending to vote for their less-evil Republican in the November general election)
  • The liberal, establishment media choose which issues will be considered and which will be ignored throughout the Republican primary
  • The liberal, establishment media define the terms of debate for the primary
  • The liberal, establishment media scalp collectors themselves exacerbate the Republican debates (you certainly can’t claim that liberals “moderate” anything)
  • Early primary states encourage crossover Democrats and independents to vote in their open and semi-open Republican primaries, to choose the Republican victor for those states.
  • Most states are wholly irrelevant to the primary process, holding their election months after most candidates have dropped out and even after the primary winner has been declared

So why go through this dog and pony show in the first place? My original candidate has never once appeared on my primary ballot and my primary vote has never once affected the outcome – having been determined months prior. Why not just let The New York Times tell us who our candidate will be — like they did in 1996 and 2008 — and be done with it? Why this charade?

We’ll just hold our nose, vote for the Times’ preferred Republican candidate, hope that he’s elected, and then pray that the elected Republican at least takes his foot off the federal budget accelerator (we can’t naively think he might brake) in deference to both those conservatives who actually voted for him in November and to his conservative rhetoric during the primary — thus delaying our inevitable Thelma and Louise moment for maybe a year or two.

Simply put, if you’re not a registered Republican, you shouldn’t vote in the Republican primary. End of story.

First published January 23, 2012, at American Thinker:                       http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/01/stop_the_charade.html

Obama hollows out the military

Crazy guy in Queens = “Islamophobia”, while real Jihadi arson attacks in LA = crazy German guy

You always have to do the establishment media’s work for them. Early on there was a report that Harry Burkhart was a 55-year old German man. Then, after the arrest, and after several hours of delaying the announcement of his identity, the police finally said that their suspect was a 24-year old German. And then there was the mention of the Chechen papers. And then the hatred for America, and the violent outburst in the courtroom over his mother’s deportation, and his arrogant sense of entitlement that he and his mother should be allowed to live in America, the land he hates. (The reason given why he committed the arsons.)

You have to piece it together, it takes several days, meanwhile the elites and the establishment media have been purposefully enabling the lie that the man is an ethnic German and the blogosphere has been afire with everyone slandering Germans, whites in general, and committing taqiyya by pretending equivalence between this event by a putative German ethnic and the thousands of examples of jihad around the world every day. “See, see? White people are terrorists too! Germans.” And then making the obligatory Hitler reference.

However, this man is a Chechen (I had guessed Turk – the largest Muslim population in Germany – when the story first broke when the only thing we had to go on was he was from Germany – like Mohamed Atta, Marwan al-Shehhi, Ziad Jarrah, and Ramzi bin al-Shibh were “from Germany”), we then have to extrapolate from the age differential that he stole the identity of a 55-year old German man (the real Harry Burkhart), and he and his mother have been living in the U.S. on the taxpayers’ dime using the fake identity, while the mother has been wanted in Germany for some crime. (The reason for her deportation.)

But the banner headlines have read for days out of Los Angeles that it was a white, German and that’s the lie that everyone will remember, even if the truth finally leaks out despite the best efforts of the elites. Much like we were regaled for months by the ubiquitous Sgt. Moose who assured us that the Beltway Sniper was a “white man in a white van” with that story’s 24/7, wall-to-wall headlines, until it turned out that the shooter was actually a Black Muslim and his twink. Then, suddenly, … >crickets<

Because the police won’t tell you this (that he’s Chechen), and the media stonewalls the information that is available. (Effectively, the people who purchase their news from the drive-bys are paying them to lie to them.) But here in NYC when someone threw Molotov cocktails at four sites in Queens, every politician was bruising each other in the ribs to be the first to the microphone to lecture white America for their firebombing a mosque and some homes owned by Muslims (how was it known before the first news reports that those homes were owned by Muslims?), that this is a despicable example of Islamophobia (an invented concept by a Muslim Brotherhood front group), that the United States is an inclusive society and there will be no tolerance for such obvious bias crimes, yadda, yadda. Until, of course, it turned out to be a disgruntled black shoplifter from a store that was one of the targeted sites. Then, suddenly, it was, “Move along. There’s nothing to see here.” The story suddenly died. No follow up stories to read, and there won’t be. Because it wasn’t a white Tea Party member. Now THAT would be a media feeding frenzy if had been one of them.

So when there is no bias (two houses, a mosque , and a Hindu house of worship in Queens) there’s a media uproar decrying nonexistent “Islamophobia”, but when there is true bias (jihadi serial firebombing of homes and vehicles in LA out of hatred of infidels) no one even learns that it was a Muslim jihadist who did it. And then, on top of that, this true bias crime in LA even gets blamed on ethnic Germans rather than the Chechen Islamist who did it.



Occupy Wall Street on George Soros’s Dime